0.3% -- paid or advertorial content share of ai citations for ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini citations (2026-05)

The paid or advertorial content share of ai citations for ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini citations is 0.3% as of 2026-05 according to Muck Rack. This figure is the primary benchmark in the Lighthouse dataset for this segment. Individual results vary by region, channel mix, and audience quality.

A strong paid or advertorial content share of ai citations benchmark for ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini citations is 0.3%, using the current serving value as of 2026-05. This is one serving-eligible observation, not a distribution median; top-quartile comparisons require the underlying distribution. Vertical, audience size, and campaign type all shift what 'good' means.

The published paid or advertorial content share of ai citations serving value for ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini citations is 0.3% as of 2026-05. Individual sectors and audiences may differ substantially; this single observation does not establish an aggregate mean. Quartile comparisons require the underlying distribution, which is not implied by this record.

Primary drivers of paid or advertorial content share of ai citations variation for ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini citations include audience segmentation, timing, and channel selection. Methodology documents campaign factors, but this serving record does not quantify the effect of personalization. The current serving value is 0.3% as of 2026-05.

For a paid media manager, the published paid or advertorial content share of ai citations serving value is 0.3%; it is an evidence-grade reference, not a personalized target as of 2026-05. Any performance goal should account for channel mix and audience. Review the methodology before operational decisions; a gap from this serving value does not by itself indicate a structural issue.