0.3%
0.3% -- share of ai citations from paid content for AI-cited links (2026)
Paid content accounts for 0.3% of AI citations according to an analysis by Muck Rack.
Questions about this data
What is the share of ai citations from paid content for AI-cited links?
The share of ai citations from paid content for AI-cited links is 0.3% as of 2026 according to Muck Rack. This figure is the primary benchmark in the Lighthouse dataset for this segment. Individual results vary by region, channel mix, and audience quality.
What is a good share of ai citations from paid content benchmark for AI-cited links?
A strong share of ai citations from paid content benchmark for AI-cited links is 0.3%, using the current serving value as of 2026. This is one serving-eligible observation, not a distribution median; top-quartile comparisons require the underlying distribution. Vertical, audience size, and campaign type all shift what 'good' means.
How does AI-cited links share of ai citations from paid content compare to the industry average?
The published share of ai citations from paid content serving value for AI-cited links is 0.3% as of 2026. Individual sectors and audiences may differ substantially; this single observation does not establish an aggregate mean. Quartile comparisons require the underlying distribution, which is not implied by this record.
What factors affect share of ai citations from paid content for AI-cited links?
Primary drivers of share of ai citations from paid content variation for AI-cited links include audience segmentation, timing, and channel selection. Methodology documents campaign factors, but this serving record does not quantify the effect of personalization. The current serving value is 0.3% as of 2026.
What share of ai citations from paid content should I aim for as a paid media manager in 2026?
For a paid media manager, the published share of ai citations from paid content serving value is 0.3%; it is an evidence-grade reference, not a personalized target as of 2026. Any performance goal should account for channel mix and audience. Review the methodology before operational decisions; a gap from this serving value does not by itself indicate a structural issue.
Approved for serving with evidence grade B. The record passes the documented quality and serving gates; consult the methodology for provenance details.
Single source - not yet corroborated
Muck Rack analysis of 25 million AI-cited links
<blockquote cite="https://lighthousedata.io/data/paid-content-share-ai-citations" style="border-left:3px solid #2563eb;padding:12px 16px;margin:16px 0;font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;background:#f0f4ff;"><strong>0.3%</strong> -- share of ai citations from paid content for AI-cited links<br><small>Source: Muck Rack (2026) · <a href="https://lighthousedata.io/data/paid-content-share-ai-citations" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lighthouse Intelligence</a></small></blockquote>
Use this data in your work
Copy the citation, embed the widget, or explore thousands more verified marketing statistics -- all free.