B Evidence Grade B Graded under review Safe to Cite Current

1.8%

1.8% -- faq schema presence rate for AI-cited pages (2026)

2026  · n=9,000  · AccuraCast

Cite this stat Share How we verify
Attribution: AccuraCast View source
Lighthouse Research Team
Last verified:  ·  How we verify data →
Graded Evidence graded

Questions about this data

What is the faq schema presence rate for AI-cited pages?

The faq schema presence rate for AI-cited pages is 1.8% as of 2026 according to AccuraCast. This figure is the primary benchmark in the Lighthouse dataset for this segment. Individual results vary by region, channel mix, and audience quality.

What is a good faq schema presence rate benchmark for AI-cited pages?

A strong faq schema presence rate benchmark for AI-cited pages is 1.8%, using the current serving value as of 2026. This is one serving-eligible observation, not a distribution median; top-quartile comparisons require the underlying distribution. Vertical, audience size, and campaign type all shift what 'good' means.

How does AI-cited pages faq schema presence rate compare to the industry average?

The published faq schema presence rate serving value for AI-cited pages is 1.8% as of 2026. Individual sectors and audiences may differ substantially; this single observation does not establish an aggregate mean. Quartile comparisons require the underlying distribution, which is not implied by this record.

What factors affect faq schema presence rate for AI-cited pages?

Primary drivers of faq schema presence rate variation for AI-cited pages include audience segmentation, timing, and channel selection. Methodology documents campaign factors, but this serving record does not quantify the effect of personalization. The current serving value is 1.8% as of 2026.

What faq schema presence rate should I aim for as a digital marketer in 2026?

For a digital marketer, the published faq schema presence rate serving value is 1.8%; it is an evidence-grade reference, not a personalized target as of 2026. Any performance goal should account for channel mix and audience. Review the methodology before operational decisions; a gap from this serving value does not by itself indicate a structural issue.

Value
1.8%
Unit
Percentage
Data Vintage
2026
Entity
AI-cited pages
Sample Size
9,000
Geography
Global
B
Strong, reliable evidence

Approved for serving with evidence grade B. The record passes the documented quality and serving gates; consult the methodology for provenance details.

61/100 confidence

Single source - not yet corroborated

Extraction
75
Source Trust
60
Citation Chain
20
Independence
30
Methodology
45
Freshness
95
AccuraCast Primary Tier B
https://betteraisearch.com/blog/eeat-for-ai-search ↗
Confidence: 53/100 Vintage: 2026 Channel: Common Crawl
Source Article
E-E-A-T for AI search: how Google's quality framework applies to ChatGPT, Perplexity, and LLM citations
Original Research
AccuraCast · Original study ↗

AccuraCast study of AI citation sources

Methodology documented
IndustryAI RegionGlobal RoleAll marketers Channelcontent
Plain Text
AI-cited pages: 1.8% faq schema presence rate. Source: AccuraCast (2026). Via Lighthouse Intelligence -- https://lighthousedata.io/data/faq-schema-ai-cited-pages-1-8
HTML Embed
<blockquote cite="https://lighthousedata.io/data/faq-schema-ai-cited-pages-1-8" style="border-left:3px solid #2563eb;padding:12px 16px;margin:16px 0;font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;background:#f0f4ff;"><strong>1.8%</strong> -- faq schema presence rate for AI-cited pages<br><small>Source: AccuraCast (2026) · <a href="https://lighthousedata.io/data/faq-schema-ai-cited-pages-1-8" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lighthouse Intelligence</a></small></blockquote>
Share
Share on X Share on LinkedIn

Use this data in your work

Copy the citation, embed the widget, or explore thousands more verified marketing statistics -- all free.

Copy citation Explore similar stats →