B Evidence Grade B Graded accuracy verified by the review judge Safe to Cite Recent

5.2%

5.2% -- reply rate for sending from a custom domain (2025)

2025  · Hunter

Cold emails sent from a custom domain have a 5.2% reply rate.

Cite this stat Share How we verify
Attribution: Hunter View source
Lighthouse Research Team
Last verified:  ·  How we verify data →
Graded Evidence graded

Questions about this data

What is the reply rate for sending from a custom domain?

The reply rate for sending from a custom domain is 5.2% as of 2025 according to Hunter. This figure is the primary benchmark in the Lighthouse dataset for this segment. Individual results vary by region, channel mix, and audience quality.

What is a good reply rate benchmark for sending from a custom domain?

A strong reply rate benchmark for sending from a custom domain is 5.2%, using the current serving value as of 2025. This is one serving-eligible observation, not a distribution median; top-quartile comparisons require the underlying distribution. Vertical, audience size, and campaign type all shift what 'good' means.

How does sending from a custom domain reply rate compare to the industry average?

The published reply rate serving value for sending from a custom domain is 5.2% as of 2025. Individual sectors and audiences may differ substantially; this single observation does not establish an aggregate mean. Quartile comparisons require the underlying distribution, which is not implied by this record.

What factors affect reply rate for sending from a custom domain?

Primary drivers of reply rate variation for sending from a custom domain include audience segmentation, timing, and channel selection. Methodology documents campaign factors, but this serving record does not quantify the effect of personalization. The current serving value is 5.2% as of 2025.

What reply rate should I aim for as a email marketer in 2025?

For a email marketer, the published reply rate serving value is 5.2%; it is an evidence-grade reference, not a personalized target as of 2025. Any performance goal should account for channel mix and audience. Review the methodology before operational decisions; a gap from this serving value does not by itself indicate a structural issue.

Value
5.2%
Unit
Percentage
Data Vintage
2025
Entity
sending from a custom domain
B
Strong, reliable evidence

Approved for serving with evidence grade B. The record passes the documented quality and serving gates; consult the methodology for provenance details.

60/100 confidence
Extraction
95
Source Trust
50
Citation Chain
60
Independence
30
Methodology
30
Freshness
95
Hunter Primary Tier A
https://hunter.io/the-state-of-cold-email/?preview=true ↗
Confidence: 53/100 Vintage: 2025 Channel: Deep Crawl
Source Article
The State of Email Outreach 2026 • Hunter
TL;DR Don't track email opens if you don't have to Campaigns without open tracking see a +68% higher reply rate (7.4% vs 4.4%). Use a business email, not freemail Sending from a custom domain delivers a +108% higher reply rate than freemail (5.2% vs 2.5%). Target tight segments (≤50 recipients) Sequ…
Also cited by
2026-08-18
2026-08-18
2026-08-18
2026-08-18
2026-08-18
2026-08-18
Original Research
Hunter · Original study ↗
Industrymarketing
Plain Text
sending from a custom domain: 5.2% reply rate. Source: Hunter (2025). Via Lighthouse Intelligence -- https://lighthousedata.io/data/custom-domain-reply-rate
HTML Embed
<blockquote cite="https://lighthousedata.io/data/custom-domain-reply-rate" style="border-left:3px solid #2563eb;padding:12px 16px;margin:16px 0;font-family:system-ui,sans-serif;background:#f0f4ff;"><strong>5.2%</strong> -- reply rate for sending from a custom domain<br><small>Source: Hunter (2025) · <a href="https://lighthousedata.io/data/custom-domain-reply-rate" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Lighthouse Intelligence</a></small></blockquote>
Share
Share on X Share on LinkedIn

Use this data in your work

Copy the citation, embed the widget, or explore thousands more verified marketing statistics -- all free.

Copy citation Explore similar stats →